Watched the gadet show last night, its great to see the C5 appear on tv, even better when its one we all know, Jason had some great and positive comments about the C5 in general and even though the segway was chosen out of the two, we all know the segway must be great fun, but whats the point if you cant take it out on the cycle paths or road on run's and who wants to stand up when getting around and where's the storage. I'm sure the segway would turn a few heads, but the C5 is more fun and it is useable aswell.
Retro Andy
..did anyone get to "tape" the show ?
I was travelling back from Dorset so I missed it
Although I can understand why it won, the Segway is a fine machine, but it and the Sinclair C5 can't really be compared to each other.
The c5 was built to be a mass produced ,cheap 'n' cheerful urban runabout with minimal running and maintenance costs.
The Segway is a proper "Gadget" using NASA style robotics and is scarily complex -meaning eye wateringly expensive repairs when compared to a C5
I spoke to a Segway owner at Bruntingthorpe during filming for the Gadget Show last year. He was singularly unimpressed with the combined purchase and running costs of his machine (approaching £10k....
). I took some movie footage on my camera of the race that was being filmed & you can hear the Segway guys in the background discussing the poor response from Segway when his one went wrong.
...I think I'll stick with my C5's